A South African got a new penis through first successful transplant, as reported this week by experts from the faculty of medicine and health services at the University of Stellenbosch. The surgery carried out in nine-hours this last December.
The patient had his penis surgically removed three years ago after complications from a circumcision performed in his teenage years, the university mentioned. The 21-year-old patient, whose name was not disclosed, has recovered completely and has had restored all functions in the recently transplanted organ, the college close to Cape Town in southwestern South Africa reported. It was the second time this type of surgery was attempted.
The college did disclose any details of the organ donor, yet noted that finding someone to give it was one of the real difficulties. A man in China got a penis transplant in 2005. That intervention also seemed to be fruitful. However specialists said the man requested that they remove his new penis after two weeks in view of psychological issues experienced by him and his wife.
Prof. Andre van der Merwe, chief of Stellenbosch University’s urology branch and pioneering the South African surgical group, stated they had initial expected that their patient would be able to full enjoy his new transplanted organ in around two years.
Van der Merwe noted:
‘We are very surprised by his rapid recovery.”
Circumcisions are performed on teenagers and young men as ritual to mark the passage to adulthood in some rural areas of South Africa. Stellenbosch University said specialists had estimated that there could be about 250 penis removals a year in the nation because of messed up circumcisions.
As indicated by the Daily Mail, the surgery was purportedly extremely complex, including micro-surgery to patch hundred of veins and nerves. Penis attachment was made conceivable through spearheading work involving facial transplants.
The specialists plan to keep on monitoring the man and how the penis functions as the man’s body might reject it. If the transplant holds on, further similar interventions will start in three-months time.
Before the transplant was performed there was a lot of discussion about the morals of the intervention. The man was not in any life- risking condition and a few surgeons questioned whether time and assets ought to be dispensed to such a technique when they are comparable to those needed for a heart transplant. Different surgeons have contended that performing such interventions better prepares specialists for the future, enabling them to embrace techniques which aid and improve patients’ lives.
Image Source: Vancouver Sun